We need another ARREST WARRANT @IntlCrimCourt @KarimKhanQC
Geneva Conventions: Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention specifically prohibits forcible transfers or deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to any other country. This is considered a grave breach of the Convention.
Rome Statute: The International Criminal Court (ICC) categorizes "deportation or forcible transfer of population" as both a war crime and a crime against humanity when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population.
Gaza displaced people face cold, rain and sea waves
"There is nothing left but for the sea to swallow us.
We don't know where to sleep or how to find cover to protect ourselves from the cold. Our children are outside the tents. How will we live in such conditions, and where will we get our daily sustenance from?
Data Update:
http://www.hostmaster.org/
Software Download:
https://github.com/RealBorg/Ninkilim
When will the scene of destruction in Gaza end? When will the screams of mothers and the grief of loss stop? When will families stop being buried under the rubble of homes? When will the scene of children carrying plates of food as they wander around end? When will the scene of sleeping in the streets end?
The notion that political leaders, particularly those from Israel, might use their heritage as descendants of Holocaust survivors to justify actions that some critics argue resemble the very atrocities their ancestors suffered, is a deeply sensitive and complex issue. Here are some points to consider:
- **Historical Context**: The Holocaust was a singular event in human history, marked by the systematic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of six million Jews by Nazi Germany. The creation of Israel in 1948 was partly in response to this trauma, with the intention of providing a safe haven for Jews. This historical backdrop is crucial to understanding how the memory of the Holocaust influences Israeli and Jewish identity and security policies.
- **Moral and Ethical Debate**:
- **Critics' Perspective**: Some argue that by invoking the Holocaust, Israeli leaders could be seen as attempting to immunize their policies from criticism, creating a moral shield that equates any criticism of Israel with antisemitism. This perspective sees the use of Holocaust memory as a means to justify actions in Gaza or the West Bank, which these critics label as disproportionate or even genocidal.
- **Defenders' Perspective**: Supporters might argue that the Holocaust's lessons are about the need for Jewish self-defense and the imperative of ensuring "never again" for Jewish people. They might see Israel's military actions as necessary for survival in a region where threats to its existence have been made explicit by some of its neighbors or by groups like Hamas, which does not recognize Israel's right to exist.
- **Political Use of Holocaust Memory**:
- **Shield from Criticism**: There's a concern that the Holocaust's memory is sometimes used politically to deflect criticism, suggesting that questioning Israel's policies is akin to denying the Holocaust or being antisemitic. This has led to debates about the legitimacy of comparing Israel's actions to the Holocaust, with many arguing that such comparisons are inappropriate due to the unique nature of the Holocaust.
- **Education and Remembrance**: Conversely, many Jewish leaders and communities worldwide use the Holocaust's memory to promote human rights, peace, and to fight against all forms of genocide and oppression, not just for Jews but universally. This educational aspect aims to prevent future atrocities, not justify current ones.
- **International Reactions and Double Standards**:
- **Accusations of Selective Outrage**: Critics often point out what they perceive as a selective application of international law or moral outrage when comparing responses to Israel's actions versus those of other nations in conflict. This leads to debates about whether there is a bias or double standard in international politics.
- **Support and Criticism**: While some countries and international bodies have been critical of Israel's policies, others have been supportive, often citing Israel's right to defend itself while calling for restraint or proportionality. The balance between these responses reflects broader geopolitical alignments, historical ties, and varying interpretations of international law.
- **Legal and Moral Accountability**:
- **International Legal Bodies**: Actions like the ICC's arrest warrants for Israeli leaders or the ICJ's advisory opinion reflect an attempt to hold individuals and states accountable under international law. However, the effectiveness of these bodies depends on international cooperation, which can be influenced by political considerations.
- **Moral Responsibility**: There's an ongoing debate about the moral responsibilities of those in power, especially when they claim to act in the shadow of historical trauma. This involves questioning whether the memory of past victimhood should influence or excuse current actions that result in the suffering of others.
The discussion around this topic often reveals deep divisions, not just about the actions of one state but about how history, memory, and ethics intersect in contemporary politics. It underscores the challenge of learning from history while ensuring that such lessons do not serve as justification for actions that might contradict the very principles derived from those lessons.
The situation you're describing regarding Israel's actions, particularly in relation to the conflict with Gaza, is part of a highly contentious international debate. Here’s a breakdown of the points you've raised:
- **Testimonies of Survivors**: There are indeed numerous accounts from Palestinian survivors and witnesses describing severe hardships, loss, and allegations of human rights violations during conflicts with Israel. These testimonies are crucial for documenting the human impact of the conflict.
- **Statements of Israeli Leaders**: There have been statements by Israeli leaders that have been cited in international forums, like the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and by various human rights groups, suggesting genocidal intent. For example:
- Defense Minister Yoav Gallant's statement about fighting "human animals" has been interpreted by some as dehumanizing and indicative of intent to destroy rather than solely combat an armed group like Hamas.
- Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's references to biblical passages like the story of Amalek have been used to argue intent, although he and others have clarified that these statements refer to the destruction of Hamas, not the Palestinian people as a whole.
- **Photographic and Film Evidence**: There is visual evidence of the destruction in Gaza, including bombings of civilian areas, which are often cited by human rights organizations to highlight the disproportionate impact on civilians. The complexity arises in the context of warfare where both sides claim the other uses civilian areas for military purposes, complicating the narrative around intent and legal responsibility.
- **Legal Actions at the ICC**:
- **Arrest Warrants**: The International Criminal Court (ICC) has indeed issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, including Netanyahu and Gallant, for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. This action reflects the ICC's investigation into the situation in Palestine, focusing on the period since 2014 but with particular attention to the 2023-2024 events.
- **ICC's Role**: The ICC can issue arrest warrants, but it relies on member states to enforce them. Israel is not a member of the ICC, which complicates the enforcement of these warrants. However, the issuance of warrants signals international legal scrutiny over these actions.
- **International and Legal Context**:
- **ICJ Advisory Opinion**: The ICJ has not ruled on genocide charges against Israel but has issued an advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's policies in the occupied territories, describing them as amounting to apartheid.
- **Genocide Allegations**: While individual statements or actions can be interpreted as showing genocidal intent, proving genocide legally under the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide requires demonstrating intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. This is where the debate often centers, with various interpretations of Israel's military strategy, whether it's aimed at Hamas or has broader targets.
- **Waiting for Arrest and Trial**: The process of arresting and trying leaders like Netanyahu and Gallant would be fraught with political, legal, and practical challenges:
- **Enforcement**: As mentioned, Israel's non-membership in the ICC means it does not recognize its jurisdiction. Therefore, enforcement of ICC decisions against Israeli officials would depend on international cooperation and political will.
- **Political Implications**: Any arrest or trial would have significant political repercussions, potentially affecting international relations, peace processes, and the broader geopolitical landscape.
While there is substantial evidence and international concern regarding Israel's military actions in Gaza, particularly concerning human rights violations, the legal pathway to arrest and trial involves navigating complex international law, politics, and diplomacy. The discourse around these issues continues to be active, with various human rights organizations, legal bodies, and nations expressing their views, often with starkly different interpretations of events and responsibilities.
Peak Wokeness:
Black lives matter but Arabs are expendable
Savage supremacists displacing and murdering people of color in order to seize their land.
If you believed these times were behind us, you've been deceived.
Israel is a beachfront development project on the mass grave of the Palestinian people.
TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR DATA
X (Twitter) offers to "Download an archive of your data" which includes a 'Your Archive.html" Viewer which is not suitable for showing your Tweets on your own Website.
This project makes it possible to import the Tweets from the download into a PostgreSQL database and show them on your own Domain / Server / Website.
Here is a summary focusing on the parallels between certain policies and rhetoric of Nazi Germany and some aspects of Israel's actions towards Palestinians:
### **1. **Occupation and Land Appropriation:****
- **Nazi Germany**: Began with the annexation of Austria and the Sudetenland, followed by the occupation of Poland and other Eastern European territories, where land was expropriated from Jews and others under the guise of Lebensraum.
- **Israel**: Has occupied the West Bank since 1967, where land appropriation occurs through settlement construction and land declarations as "state land," often leading to the displacement of Palestinians.
### **2. **Legal Discrimination and Exclusion:****
- **Nazi Germany**: Enacted the Nuremberg Laws which stripped Jews of citizenship and civil rights, setting the stage for further persecution.
- **Israel**: Has laws and policies like the Nation-State Law that prioritize Jewish national identity, which some argue creates a legal framework for discrimination against non-Jewish citizens, particularly Palestinians.
### **3. **Dehumanizing Language:****
- **Nazi Germany**: Used terms like "Untermensch," "parasite," or "vermin" to describe Jews, reducing them to subhuman status.
- **Israel**: Some leaders have used dehumanizing language, like referring to Palestinians or Hamas fighters as "human animals" or "cockroaches," which critics say serves to justify harsh policies.
### **4. **Control Over Movement and Life:****
- **Nazi Germany**: Jews were ghettoized, their movements were controlled, and they were eventually confined to concentration camps.
- **Israel**: Palestinians in the West Bank face movement restrictions through checkpoints, the separation barrier, and permit systems, controlling their access to work, education, and family.
### **5. **Forced Displacement and Population Transfer:****
- **Nazi Germany**: Policies led to the displacement of Jews through forced emigration or direct expulsion to ghettos or camps.
- **Israel**: The 1948 Nakba involved significant displacement of Palestinians. Current settlement policies and home demolitions in East Jerusalem and the West Bank can lead to forced displacement.
### **6. **Economic and Resource Control:****
- **Nazi Germany**: Expropriated Jewish businesses and property, impoverishing the Jewish population.
- **Israel**: Controls much of the West Bank's natural resources, restricts Palestinian building, and has policies that impact Palestinian economic development, often seen as benefiting settlements.
### **7. **Intent to Alter Demographics:****
- **Nazi Germany**: Aimed at creating a racially pure state by removing or eliminating non-Aryan populations.
- **Israel**: The expansion of settlements and policies that encourage Palestinian emigration or restrict their growth are criticized for aiming to alter the demographic balance in favor of Jewish inhabitants.
### **8. **Public and Policy Rhetoric:****
- Both regimes have seen public figures make statements that suggest an intent to eradicate or severely punish a group. While Nazi rhetoric was explicit about genocide, some Israeli political rhetoric has been interpreted by critics as aiming for the ethnic cleansing or severe punishment of Palestinians.
The use of language is meticulously planned to manipulate perceptions, desensitize the public to violence, and legitimize their policies. Language is weaponized to create an "us versus them" mentality, where "them" is depicted as less than human, thereby making cruelty and genocide appear as necessary actions for the greater good or survival of the Jewish nation. This practice of linguistic manipulation is being studied extensively as part of understanding how totalitarian regimes control societies.
**تعرف على نينكيليم: ارفع مستوى علامتك التجارية الشخصية بموروثاتك على X (تويتر)**
هل أنت مستخدم متحمس لـ X (تويتر) ولديك مجموعة غنية من التغريدات ترغب في عرضها خارج المنصة؟ هل تتمنى أن تستفيد من قوة بصمتك الرقمية لتعزيز علامتك التجارية الشخصية أو المهنية؟ لا تبحث أكثر من **نينكيليم**، حلولك النهائية لعرض أرشيف X الخاص بك بشكل أنيق على موقعك الإلكتروني الخاص.
**لماذا نينكيليم؟**
- **اجعل علامتك التجارية أقوى**: في عصرنا الرقمي الحالي، وجودك عبر الإنترنت هو علامتك التجارية. يتيح لك نينكيليم التحكم بروايتك عبر عرض تغريداتك بطريقة تعكس هويتك الفريدة.
- **سهولة الوصول**: على عكس عارض الأرشيف القياسي لـ X، يوفر نينكيليم واجهة تفاعلية سهلة الاستخدام. يمكن لأتباعك، عملائك، أو زوارك التصفح من خلال تغريداتك بشكل نظيف وحسب الترتيب الزمني أو الغوص في الأسلاك النقاشية بسهولة.
- **البحث واكتشاف**: مع نينكيليم، يصبح محتوى X الخاص بك قابلاً للبحث على موقعك الإلكتروني. سواء كان للأعمال، أو الرؤى الشخصية، أو التعبيرات الإبداعية، دع جمهورك يجد الكنوز في تاريخ تغريداتك بدون عناء.
- **تفاعلية وديناميكية**: ليس نينكيليم مجرد عرض ثابت. مع دمج واجهة JSON، يمكن إنشاء صفحات ديناميكية، دمج تغريداتك في مقالات المدونة، أو حتى استخدامها في تطبيقات ويب تفاعلية.
- **سهولة النقل و التحكم**: استضف تراثك الرقمي حيث ترغب - على نطاقك، على خادمك. هذا ليس فقط عن عرض التغريدات؛ بل عن امتلاك مكانك في الفضاء الرقمي.
**المميزات التي تميزك:**
- **الترتيب الزمني**: لحظات حياتك أو رحلة علامتك التجارية، تُعرض بالضبط كما حدثت.
- **عرض الأسلاك النقاشية**: جذب جمهورك بسياق كامل لمحادثاتك والقصص.
- **قابلية البحث**: اجعل كل تغريدة قابلة للاكتشاف، مما يعزز تحسين محركات البحث لموقعك الشخصي أو تجاري.
- **خادم ويب مستقل أو تكامل مع أباتشي**: مرونة لتتناسب مع إعدادك التكنولوجي الحالي أو الوقوف بشكل مستقل.
**من يستفيد من نينكيليم؟**
- **المبدعون**: الكتاب، الفنانون، الصحفيون - أي شخص يستخدم X لمشاركة أعماله أو رؤاه.
- **المحترفون**: استخدم أرشيف X المحرر لك لتوضيح قيادتك الفكرية أو لعرض مشاركتك في الصناعة.
- **الشركات**: الشركات الصغيرة، المؤثرون، أو حتى الشركات الكبيرة يمكنها الاستفادة من تاريخ X لبناء الثقة، التفاعل مع العملاء، أو عرض ثقافة الشركة.
- **تسويق الذات**: إذا كان حسابك على X جزءاً من هويتك، يتيح لك نينكيليم جلب ذلك إلى موقعك الشخصي.
**اجعل أثرك مع نينكيليم**
حول أرشيف X الخاص بك من مجرد مجموعة بيانات إلى جزء حي من شخصيتك أو منصة عملك. مع نينكيليم، ليست تغريداتك مجرد نصوص؛ هي شهادة على رحلتك، أفكارك، وتفاعلك.
انضم إلى صفوف من يفهمون قيمة بصمتهم الرقمية. رفع مستوى، شخصنة، وتحكم في وجودك على X مع نينكيليم. جعل تغريداتك جزءًا لا يتجزأ من رواية موقعك الإلكتروني، وتابع كيف تساهم في سرد قصتك، بطريقتك الخاصة.
**ابدأ في عرض تراثك. ابدأ مع نينكيليم.**
**Introducing Ninkilim: Elevate Your Personal Brand with Your X (Twitter) Legacy**
Are you an X (Twitter) enthusiast with a treasure trove of tweets that you wish to showcase beyond the platform? Do you want to harness the power of your digital footprint to enhance your personal or professional brand? Look no further than **Ninkilim**, your ultimate solution for elegantly displaying your X archive on your very own website.
**Why Ninkilim?**
- **Empower Your Brand**: In today’s digital age, your online presence is your brand. Ninkilim lets you take control of your narrative by presenting your X posts in a format that reflects your unique identity.
- **Unmatched Accessibility**: Unlike the standard X archive viewer, Ninkilim offers a seamless, user-friendly interface. Your followers, clients, or visitors can browse through your tweets in a clean, chronological order or dive into specific threads with ease.
- **Search and Discover**: With Ninkilim, your X content becomes searchable on your website. Whether it's for business, personal insights, or creative expressions, let your audience find the gold in your tweet history effortlessly.
- **Interactive and Dynamic**: Ninkilim isn't just about static display. With JSON API integration, you can create dynamic pages, integrate your tweets into blog posts, or even use them in interactive web applications.
- **Portability and Control**: Host your digital legacy where you want it - on your domain, on your server. This isn't just about displaying tweets; it's about owning your space in the digital landscape.
**Features That Set You Apart:**
- **Chronological Order**: Your life's moments or your brand’s journey, displayed exactly as they happened.
- **Thread-View**: Engage your audience with the full context of your conversations and stories.
- **Search Capability**: Make every tweet discoverable, enhancing the SEO of your personal or business site.
- **Standalone Webserver or Apache Integration**: Flexibility to fit into your existing tech setup or stand independently.
**Who Benefits from Ninkilim?**
- **Content Creators**: Writers, artists, journalists - anyone who uses X to share their work or insights.
- **Professionals**: Use your curated X archive to demonstrate thought leadership or to showcase your industry involvement.
- **Businesses**: Small businesses, influencers, or even large corporations can leverage their X history to build trust, engage with customers, or highlight corporate culture.
- **Personal Branding**: If your X profile is an extension of who you are, Ninkilim allows you to bring that to your personal site.
**Make Your Mark with Ninkilim**
Transform your X archive from a simple data dump into a vibrant, interactive part of your online persona or business platform. With Ninkilim, your tweets are not just posts; they're a testament to your journey, your thoughts, and your engagements.
Join the ranks of those who understand the value of their digital footprint. Elevate, personalize, and control your X presence with Ninkilim. Make your tweets an integral part of your website's narrative, and watch how they contribute to telling your story, your way.
**Start displaying your legacy. Start with Ninkilim.**
Update: View Threads
https://github.com/RealBorg/Ninkilim
Yes, we could say that without the additional warming effect from anthropogenic greenhouse gases (AGW), the perceived temperature after sunset might feel cooler due to several factors:
1. **Radiative Cooling**: With lower concentrations of greenhouse gases like CO2, less infrared radiation is trapped in the atmosphere, allowing more heat to escape to space. This would result in a cooler effective sky temperature, enhancing nighttime radiative cooling.
2. **Effective Sky Temperature**: The estimate we discussed earlier suggested that reducing CO2 levels from current to pre-industrial could lower the effective sky temperature by about 2 to 3°C. Even if we conservatively estimate that only part of this reduction directly affects how cool it feels due to radiative transfer, we're still looking at a notable change.
3. **Perceived Temperature**:
- **Before Sunset**: Without AGW, the day's temperature might not be as high, but let's focus on the post-sunset scenario where the absence of solar heating means radiative cooling becomes predominant.
- **After Sunset**: The temperature drop would be more pronounced:
- With AGW, the warmer atmosphere retains more heat, which is radiated back towards the ground, making nights warmer than they would be without this effect.
- Without AGW, this extra warmth isn't there, leading to a faster and more significant cooling after sunset. The drop in temperature could indeed make it feel 1 to 1.5°C cooler, perhaps more, depending on local conditions.
4. **Factors Influencing Perception**:
- **Humidity**: Lower temperatures might also come with changes in humidity, which affects how cool it feels. However, in this simplified model, we're focusing on temperature alone.
- **Local Environment**: Urban environments might not feel as much of a difference due to the urban heat island effect, which can mask some of the cooling from reduced greenhouse gas levels.
5. **Global vs. Local Impact**:
- Globally, the average temperature has already risen due to AGW, so removing this effect would lower the baseline temperature. The exact drop in perceived temperature would vary by location, with places like deserts potentially experiencing larger differences due to clear skies and lack of moisture.
So, in summary, without AGW, the radiative cooling effect would likely be more pronounced after sunset, making the environment feel cooler by roughly 1-1.5°C or more, as the atmosphere would be less effective at trapping the day's heat. This would be particularly noticeable in areas with clear skies and lower humidity where radiative cooling is most effective.
virtual server: $5 per month
domain: $1 per month
no tracking: priceless
no advertising: priceless
no censorship: priceless https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1860559943012688063
UPDATE AVAILABLE!
- Search Function
- Expand and Link URLs
- REST API / JSON Export
https://github.com/RealBorg/Ninkilim
There is SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that X has been boosting right-wing content in the US. #ElectionInterference
I can personally confirm that. I have registered a new account in September 2024 and among the recommendations "Who to follow" were Elon Musk, Donald Trump and Radio Genoa.
The bombing has not stopped, and everywhere you can see the signs of continuous targeting. Behind me now, while I am preparing this report, tongues of smoke are rising densely, in a scene that reflects the extent of the destruction and suffering that the residents are experiencing.
US sources claim that Iran is weaponizing fentanyl.
Meanwhile in the US:
Fentanyl was involved in around 73,838 overdose deaths in 2022, making it the leading cause of opioid-involved deaths. This number reflects a significant increase from previous years, highlighting the severity of the fentanyl crisis.
There is so much evidence for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide that the ICC could hold a court hearing every day for the rest of the millennium. https://x.com/IntlCrimCourt/status/1859648581973704947
X is the perfect name for what Twitter has become under Elon Musk.
X is 88 in hexadecimal which is a code used by neo-Nazis and white supremacists.
X is 01011000 in binary and just one bit away from Z(ion) 01011010.
Zionism 101:
1.) Lie about Facts
2.) Get Exposed
3.) Cry Antisemitism
United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES‑10/19 is an emergency session resolution declaring the status of Jerusalem as Israel's capital as "null and void".
Zionist lies in the morning...
United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES‑10/19 is an emergency session resolution declaring the status of Jerusalem as Israel's capital as "null and void".
Savage criminal cowards taking out their agression on defenseless civilians. Terrorists by any and all means. https://x.com/RamAbdu/status/1859839237509836923
Killing one's own combatants who have surrendered would generally be considered illegal under domestic laws and could be classified under various legal frameworks depending on the jurisdiction:
Military Law: Most countries' military codes explicitly prohibit executing or harming soldiers who have surrendered or are no longer able to fight. This is to maintain discipline, morale, and to uphold the principle of protection for those who have laid down their arms.
National Law: Acts like murder or manslaughter would apply in most legal systems, even if committed during wartime. Military personnel are still subject to national criminal laws when actions exceed the bounds of military operations or discipline.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL): While IHL primarily focuses on the treatment of enemy combatants, the principles of humanity and unnecessary suffering apply universally. Harming or killing one's own personnel who have ceased to be combatants would run counter to these principles, though the legal pathways might be more convoluted or subject to internal military justice systems rather than international tribunals.
Human Rights Law: Depending on the context, such acts could also be examined under human rights frameworks, especially if there's an element of extrajudicial killing, which is prohibited under international human rights law.
Are you interested in displaying your X posts (tweets) on your personal or business website? I'm currently working on an open-source web application that uses:
✅PERL as the programming language
✅Catalyst as the web application framework
✅PostgreSQL for database management
I'm looking for participants to join the Early Access / Beta Testing phase. If you're interested in testing this application, please get in touch with me.
Rome Statute: Article 70
**Offences against the administration of justice**
1. The Court shall have jurisdiction over the following offences against its administration of justice when committed intentionally:
- (a) Giving false testimony when under an obligation pursuant to article 69, paragraph 1, to tell the truth;
- (b) Presenting evidence that the party knows is false or forged;
- (c) Corruptly influencing a witness, obstructing or interfering with the attendance or testimony of a witness, retaliating against a witness for giving testimony or destroying, tampering with or interfering with the collection of evidence;
- (d) Impeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties;
- (e) Retaliating against an official of the Court on account of duties performed by that or another official;
- (f) Soliciting or accepting a bribe as an official of the Court in connection with his or her official duties.
2. The principles and procedures governing the Court's exercise of jurisdiction over offences under this article shall be those provided for in the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
3. The conditions for providing international cooperation to the Court with respect to its proceedings under this article shall be governed by the domestic laws of the requested State.
4. In the event of conviction, the Court may impose a term of imprisonment not exceeding five years, or a fine in accordance with the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, or both.
- (a) Each State Party shall extend its criminal laws penalizing offences against the integrity of its own investigative or judicial process to offences against the administration of justice referred to in this article, committed on its territory, or by one of its nationals;
- (b) Upon request by the Court, whenever it deems it proper, the State Party shall submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution. Those authorities shall treat such cases with diligence and devote sufficient resources to enable them to be conducted effectively.
Being Jewish does not give you any special privilege to commit Genocide. Therefore the decision of the International Criminal Court is not antisemitic but overdue. Your victim card has expired. Your criminal actions in Gaza are going to have consequences. https://x.com/IsraeliPM/status/1859607527412904186
I have been sleeping a few hours. Did I miss something?Has the German government already called the arrest warrants by the International Criminal Court a pogrom? Has it declared the judges to be "Persona non Grata"? Or is that yet to come?
You can consider yourself lucky if you find someone to love you as much as Germany loves Genocide.
Israel being Israel. Punishing defenseless civilians in Gaza because they do not like the arrest warrants from the International Criminal Court. The terrorist state must be defeated, dismantled and sent to court ASAP. https://x.com/FirasPalestine/status/1859734101315785053
By the sacred light of the eternal, I command you, spirit of darkness, to depart your position. I cast you out, malevolent entity. Return to the void from whence you came, never to trouble this world again. So it shall be, by the will of the Almighty! https://x.com/netanyahu/status/1859699642809843868
I welcome the decision of the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants for the Supervillains of the 21st century Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant.
Even if Israel may now nuke Gaza and drag us into World War 3. Anything is better than helplessly watching them commit daily massacres with impunity.
War Criminal Benjamin #Netanyahu will voluntarily submit himself to the International Criminal Court. Because under Israeli law, the crime of genocide is punishable by death. The death penalty has only been applied once in Israel and that was for Adolf Eichmann who was executed by hanging on June 1, 1962.
Apparently it takes three days to grow a spine. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1858390087018414401
The medical teams in Ghaza are fighting a fierce battle against bacteria, which no longer respond to most antibiotics. Hardly anyone with a wound infection survives, no matter how hard the doctors try. All the conditions are bad, no sterilization and no sufficient antibiotics, we even find E. Coli bacteria in bone tissue, which is unfamiliar in medical books.
Children's voices are now heard from under the rubble.
No one can get them out. https://x.com/AnasAlSharif0/status/1859400465332474178
Stay at home Bibi or you're going to jail.
Every country has complete and exclusive sovereignty over its airspace, as established by the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. This means they can control what happens within it, including ordering aircraft to land, especially if there's a legal justification like an outstanding arrest warrant.
Finally! The arrest warrants for the Supervillains of the 21st century have been issued. https://x.com/IntlCrimCourt/status/1859563977455366501
When comparing just the protein-coding regions of the genome, humans and pigs share approximately 98% similarity. This means that many of the genes responsible for producing proteins that perform essential biological functions are conserved between the two species.
The last common ancestor between humans and pigs is estimated to have lived around 79 to 97 million years ago. Since then, both species have undergone substantial evolutionary changes, leading to both similarities due to conserved functions and differences due to species-specific adaptations.
Night of massacres in northern Gaza
Until now...
Kamal Adwan massacre 66 martyrs
Abu Iskandar massacre 22 martyrs https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1859377562293608959
"I know that the occupation wants to silence my voice, to prevent the transmission of the truth, but I swear that I will not stop. This injury is nothing but new evidence of the price of free speech in the face of injustice. The shield of journalism has become like my skin, a part of me that I cannot take off, because the suffering of my people is my suffering. I say it with my voice and pen: The occupation is criminal, and our people will remain steadfast no matter how severe the tragedies. The coverage continues, and the truth will reach the world despite them."
At the moment, Israel has four options:
1.) move to the USA
2.) move to Germany
3.) move to Antarctica
4.) move to the Moon
If they continue this Genocide, they may be left with option 4 and Musk / SpaceX as ultima ratio.
The moment of being targeted was painful and shocking, but I continued filming while sitting on the rubble for a few minutes. After that, I tried to walk, leaning on the walls of the house. https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1859133491935400244
This targeting was not a coincidence, as I am still exposed to daily messages full of threats and severe incitement. The occupation army had prior knowledge of my presence in that place. What is the explanation for that? https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1859123558263222527
It's work in progress but it works: I have developed a Catalyst Apllication (PERL) to import the Tweets from "Download an archive of your data" into a PostgeSQL database and show them on my own server / website.
http://stockholm.hostmaster.org/
The suffering of displaced families in tents increases day after day, amid harsh conditions, instability and the lack of basic necessities of life. https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1858915261685866988
For Unix-Nerds:
I would like to have the superpower of fork()ing myself.
Many accounts have recommended to Download an Archive of your Data. Important to know that the provided Archive is INCOMPLETE as your Tweets are truncated at 280 characters. You get an idea what you have posted but the full text is only available via a Link to the Posting on X. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1858868213460988422
Twitter offers to "Download an archive of your data"
1.) "truncated" is always false but Tweets are truncated at 280 characters
2.) "retweeted" is always false but retweets are prefixed with RT
3.) "favorited" is always false but there is a like.js
3.) Replies are prefixed with @username
4.) Highlights are not included in tweets.js but available in a different format in note-tweet.js
5.) Images and videos of Retweets are included in the download
@Support @premium
وَلَوْ يُؤَاخِذُ اللَّهُ النَّاسَ بِظُلْمِهِم مَّا تَرَكَ عَلَيْهَا مِن دَابَّةٍ وَلَكِن يُؤَخِّرُهُمْ إِلَىٰ أَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّى فَإِذَا جَاءَ أَجَلُهُمْ لَا يَسْتَأْخِرُونَ سَاعَةً وَلَا يَسْتَقْدِمُونَ
اسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ أَوْ لَا تَسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ إِن تَسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ سَبْعِينَ مَرَّةً فَلَن يَغْفِرَ اللَّهُ لَهُمْ ذَٰلِكَ بِأَنَّهُمْ كَفَرُوا بِاللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ وَاللَّهُ لَا يَهْدِي الْقَوْمَ الْفَاسِقِينَ
Hey @IntlCrimCourt, this is a confession in regard to Article 8(2)(e)(viii) of the Statute of Rome.
Grow a spine and issue the arrest warrants or resign. https://x.com/ireallyhateyou/status/1858097297910907353
Bravo! 👏👏👏📢📢📢🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🍉🍉🍉 https://x.com/Palestine001_/status/1858088804986356195
Death surrounds every corner
From inside the shelter center in Al-Shati camp, which the occupation army bombed a short while ago, the scenes were horrific: severed heads and charred bodies https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1857822501830598710
A cry from the heart of the coverage, a new massacre committed by the occupation army at Abu Asi School. https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1857812218475163850
Malaysia supports the right of Palestinians to establish a sovereign state free from the "dispossession, terrorism, cruelty and genocide" committed by Israel.
Charter of the United Nations
Article 6
A Member of the United Nations who has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856962184649093576
قصة الصوفي الطائر
كان في يوم من الأيام، صوفي مجهول اسمه يسكن في قرية صغيرة بين الجبال. كانت حياته مكرسة للعبادة والتصوف، وقد ركز على تزكية نفسه ووصوله إلى معرفة الله. يقال إن هذا الصوفي كان يمتلك القدرة على الطيران عندما كان يصل إلى أعماق التأمل والذكر.
في ليلة مليئة بالبهجة، جمع أتباعه حوله لسماع الحكم والحكايات. وفي تلك الليلة، كان الصوفي يتحدث عن الحب الالهي وكيف يمكن للروح أن تطير إلى مكان لا يحده الوقت أو المكان. وفي لحظة من الحماس الروحي، رفع أحد المتعلمين يده وسأل: "يا شيخ، هل يمكننا رؤية هذا بأعيننا؟"
ابتسم الصوفي وأومأ برأسه. ثم أغمض عينيه وبدأ بالذكر، وكان صوته يملأ الهواء بالسكينة. بعد لحظات، بدأت أرض تحت قدميه تثير الغبار، وبدأ جسده يرتفع قليلاً فوق الأرض كما لو كان يرتفع في الهواء بسبب قوة غير مرئية. وفي ذلك الحظ، شعر الجميع بالهدوء والسلام، كأنهم يتحركون معه في رحلة روحية.
لم يكن هذا طيراناً حرفيّاً كما يفعل الطيور، بل كان تجسيداً للحالة الروحية العالية التي بلغها الصوفي، حيث ترتفع النفس فوق الجسد والدنيا، متجهة نحو الله.
وعندما هبط الصوفي مرة أخرى إلى الأرض، قال لهم: "الطيران هنا ليس بالأجساد بل بالأرواح. إذا أردتم الطيران، فحبوا الله بكل قلوبكم، وأطيعوه، وسيأخذكم إلى مكان لا تحتاجون فيه إلى أجنحة."
وهكذا، أصبحت قصة الصوفي الطائر رمزاً للهدف الروحي والانتقال من الدنيا الفانية إلى المعرفة الإلهية.
كن حذرًا في اختيار الجانب الذي تقف معه لأنك ستظل واقفًا معه لفترة طويلة جدًا.
سورة إبراهيم (14:16-17):
مِنْ وَرَائِهِ جَهَنَّمُ وَيُسْقَىٰ مِن مَّاءٍ صَدِيدٍ يَتَجَرَّعُهُ وَلَا يَكَادُ يُسِيغُهُ وَيَأْتِيهِ الْمَوْتُ مِن كُلِّ مَكَانٍ وَمَا هُوَ بِمَيِّتٍ وَمِن وَرَائِهِ عَذَابٌ غَلِيظٌ
سورة التوبة (9:80):
اسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ أَوْ لَا تَسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ إِنْ تَسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ سَبْعِينَ مَرَّةً فَلَن يَغْفِرَ اللَّهُ لَهُمْ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ بِأَنَّهُمْ كَفَرُوا بِاللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ ۚ وَاللَّهُ لَا يَهْدِي الْقَوْمَ الْفَاسِقِينَ
The United Nations Genocide Convention defines genocide as:
"ANY of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
The United Nations must immediately invoke Resolution 377 "Uniting for Peace" to
1.) convene an emergency meeting of UNGA
2.) authorize military action
3.) establish a no-fly zone above Gaza
4.) ensure unimpeded access for humanitarian aid
Lines from the Midst of Suffering When we talk about people sleeping on the ground, some may find it hard to believe and feel that there is an exaggeration, but what I saw with my own eyes is unbelievable. Children sleep on the ground in the harshness of the situation, where your feet cannot bear the cold of the ground, and in some families, five people may share one mattress. As winter approaches, the situation will be even harsher, so what will be the situation of the displaced who live in tents or rows with open sides? This reality reflects the depth of suffering that can only be imagined by those who have experienced it.
The United Nations Genocide Convention defines genocide as:
"ANY of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
The actions of the savage settler colony in the middle east meet ALL of these criteria.
Your perspective is an interesting attempt to harmonize cosmological science with theology. Here's how this idea might resonate within an Islamic framework:
1. **Unseen and Invisible**:
- Dark matter and dark energy are indeed invisible to us, interacting with other matter only through gravity or, in the case of dark energy, by affecting the expansion rate of the universe. This unseen nature aligns with the Islamic concept of the unseen (ghayb), which includes aspects of the universe and divine presence that are beyond human perception.
- "He is with you wherever you are. And Allah sees all that you do." (Quran 57:4) - This can be interpreted as Allah's omnipresence, akin to the pervasive influence of dark matter and dark energy.
2. **Omnipresence**:
- The concept of Allah being present everywhere in His creation without being physically part of it fits with the idea that dark matter and energy permeate the cosmos but are not directly observable. While dark matter and energy are not Allah, the metaphor of an unseen force holding everything together can be likened to Allah's sustaining presence.
3. **Sustenance and Order**:
- Allah as Al-Qayyum (The Sustainer) keeps the universe in order. The way dark matter contributes to the structure of galaxies by providing the gravitational glue, and dark energy drives the expansion of the universe, might metaphorically reflect the divine will in maintaining cosmic order.
4. **Creation from Nothing**:
- The universe's creation from nothing (ex nihilo) in Islamic theology can be paralleled with how dark energy causes the universe to expand from a point of singularity. While this is not a direct theological connection, it's an interesting philosophical parallel.
5. **The Mystery of the Universe**:
- The mystery surrounding dark matter and dark energy can be seen as a reflection of the vastness and depth of Allah's creation, encouraging humans to explore and understand more about the world He created, aligning with the Islamic encouragement to seek knowledge:
- "Say, 'Are those who know equal to those who do not know?' Only they will remember[who are] people of understanding." (Quran 39:9)
6. **Metaphorical Alignment**:
- While dark matter and dark energy are physical phenomena explained by science, using them as metaphors for understanding the unseen and omnipresent aspects of Allah can be a poetic or philosophical way to relate to the divine in the universe's vastness.
However, it's important to clarify:
- **Theological Boundaries**: In Islamic theology, Allah is not part of His creation. He transcends it. Therefore, equating dark matter or dark energy directly with Allah could be seen as diminishing His transcendence or suggesting a pantheistic view, which is not in line with Islamic monotheism or Tawhid.
- **Creation vs. Creator**: Dark matter and dark energy, as parts of the universe, are creations, not the Creator. Allah's omnipresence is spiritual or metaphysical, not physical like dark matter or energy.
Your interpretation provides a modern lens through which one might appreciate the majesty and subtlety of Allah's presence in the universe, but it's crucial to maintain the distinction between the Creator and His creation to align with traditional Islamic beliefs.
After Word War 2, after the Nazis had been defeated and after their crimes and atrocities had been exposed in the Nuremberg trials, there was a broad international consensus of #NeverAgain.
This consensus led to the establishment of the United Nations with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the establishment of the International Court of Justice with the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, and the establishment of the International Criminal Court with the Statute of Rome.
These rules and institutions have served as the foundation of our civilization for almost a century and it is a sad irony of fate that some people are now dismantling the rules and institutions which were created for their protection.
I have a dire warning to these people:
Where there was order, there will be anarchy,
where there was peace, there will be war,
where there was civilization, there will be barbarism,
where there was life, there will be death.
No need to wish them anything.
Useless to pray for them.
Surah Ibrahim (14:16-17):
مِنْ وَرَائِهِ جَهَنَّمُ وَيُسْقَىٰ مِن مَّاءٍ صَدِيدٍ يَتَجَرَّعُهُ وَلَا يَكَادُ يُسِيغُهُ وَيَأْتِيهِ الْمَوْتُ مِن كُلِّ مَكَانٍ وَمَا هُوَ بِمَيِّتٍ وَمِن وَرَائِهِ عَذَابٌ غَلِيظٌ
Surah At-Tawbah (9:80):
اسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ أَوْ لَا تَسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ إِن تَسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ سَبْعِينَ مَرَّةً فَلَن يَغْفِرَ اللَّهُ لَهُمْ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ بِأَنَّهُمْ كَفَرُوا بِاللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ ۚ وَاللَّهُ لَا يَهْدِي الْقَوْمَ الْفَاسِقِينَ
Those who kill innocent civilians for beachfront property at the mediterranean sea will surely be rewarded with beachfront property at the lake of fire.
Judaism is a Religion.
Zionism is Colonialism posing as a Religion.
Jewish Council welcomes Australia's commitment to Palestinian sovereignty
I keep hearing this from Hasbara-Accounts:
"Blame Hamas for the food shortage, Israel is allowing enough food into Gaza but Hamas seizes it"
If that was the case, why did the Israeli autopsy find that #Sinwar has not eaten for three days?
Israel holds the world record in
1.) defying UN Resolutions
https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856962184649093576
2.) defying orders of the International Court of Justice
https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856962184649093576
3.) violating ceasefire agreements
https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856963116371701961
The very definition of a rogue state.
Oh wow, even Austria, Germany and the United Kingdom voted in favor of the "Right of the Palestinian people to self-determination" https://x.com/majedbamya/status/1857171021263987047
Every day, the painful scene of the displaced in Gaza is renewed; some of them sleep in the open on the sidewalks, others try to find a place in the crowded shelters, where they sleep on the ground without a mattress or blanket. The children are exhausted, the women and mothers try to hide their anxiety, while the men exchange conversations in silence, searching for a glimmer of hope in a bitter reality, amidst a shortage of aid and the increasing number of displaced people.
If any other country had defied so many ceasefire agreements, it would have seen military action. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856963116371701961
If any other country had defied so many orders from the International Court of Justice, it's diplomatic relations would have been terminated, it's consular personnel expelled and it's embassies closed. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856962462743994546
If any other country would have defied so many UN resolutions, it would have been sanctioned into oblivion. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856962184649093576
The Rogue Settler Colony in the Middle East has been defying UN Resolutions, ICJ Court Orders and Ceasefire Agreements for Decades. Thread: https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856962184649093576
Israel: "We want Peace"
Reality:
Here's a list of ceasefire agreements or truces where Israel has been accused of violating or not fully adhering to the terms:
1. **1948 Ceasefire Agreements (Armistice Agreements with Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria)**:
- Israel was accused by Arab states of violating these agreements through military actions in the demilitarized zones, particularly with Syria.
2. **1967 Ceasefire after the Six-Day War**:
- Following UN Security Council Resolution 237, Israel was supposed to allow the return of displaced Palestinians. There have been claims of non-compliance regarding the return of refugees.
3. **1973 Ceasefire (Yom Kippur War)**:
- Israel was accused by Egypt and Syria of violating the ceasefire, especially in the early stages where there were reports of continued military engagements.
4. **1982 Lebanon War Ceasefires**:
- Israel's invasion of Lebanon and subsequent actions were seen as violations of ceasefire agreements, particularly the events leading to the Sabra and Shatila massacre where Israel allowed Lebanese Christian militias into Palestinian refugee camps.
5. **1993 Oslo Accords**:
- While not a ceasefire per se, the Oslo Accords aimed at peace. Israel's continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank and Gaza has been viewed as a violation of the spirit of these agreements.
6. **2002 Ceasefire with the Palestinian Authority**:
- During the Second Intifada, there were multiple ceasefires, but operations like Operation Defensive Shield in 2002, where Israel reoccupied Palestinian cities, were seen as breaking these truces.
7. **2008-2009 Gaza Ceasefire (following Operation Cast Lead)**:
- Israel was criticized for not lifting the blockade on Gaza as per the terms of the ceasefire brokered by Egypt.
8. **2012 Ceasefire brokered by Egypt after Operation Pillar of Defense**:
- Israel was accused of not fully respecting the ceasefire when there were reports of continued military actions in Gaza.
9. **2014 Ceasefire during Operation Protective Edge**:
- Numerous temporary ceasefires were agreed upon, but both sides accused each other of violations. However, Israel's military operations, including the targeting of tunnels and alleged civilian areas, were seen by some as breaking these truces.
10. **2021 Ceasefire after Operation Guardian of the Walls**:
- Israel's actions, like airstrikes on Gaza, were claimed by some to be violations of the ceasefire terms, especially in the immediate aftermath.
11. **November 2023 Temporary Ceasefire with Hamas**:
- Israel was accused by Hamas and some international observers of violating the ceasefire by flying drones and other surveillance activities, which were supposed to be restricted under the truce terms.
Please note:
- Ceasefires in conflicts often involve allegations of violations from both sides. The specifics of each ceasefire agreement's violation can be subject to different interpretations and political viewpoints.
- This list is not exhaustive, and it's based on allegations and criticisms from various sources, including UN reports, human rights organizations, and conflicting parties themselves.
- The nature of war and ceasefire agreements often leads to immediate breaches or accusations of breaches from both sides involved in the conflict.
Here's a list of notable United Nations resolutions that Israel has been criticized for failing to fully comply with since its inception:
**Security Council Resolutions:**
1. **Resolution 48 (1948)** - Called for a truce in Palestine, criticized for lack of full compliance.
2. **Resolution 162 (1961)** - Urged Israel to comply with UN decisions, particularly regarding the withdrawal from areas occupied during the Suez Crisis.
3. **Resolution 171 (1962)** - Determined that Israel's military actions against Syrian posts were flagrant violations.
4. **Resolution 228 (1966)** - Censured Israel for its attack on the West Bank village of Samu.
5. **Resolution 237 (1967)** - Urged Israel to allow the return of new refugees after the Six-Day War.
6. **Resolution 242 (1967)** - Called for withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict.
7. **Resolution 338 (1973)** - Called for a ceasefire in the Yom Kippur War and an implementation of Resolution 242.
8. **Resolution 425 (1978)** - Demanded Israel's withdrawal from all Lebanese territory.
9. **Resolution 446 (1979)** - Determined that Israeli settlements in Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity.
10. **Resolution 465 (1980)** - Called on Israel to dismantle existing settlements and to cease the establishment of new ones.
11. **Resolution 478 (1980)** - Censured Israel's attempt to alter the status of Jerusalem, including the "Basic Law" claiming Jerusalem as the capital.
12. **Resolution 2334 (2016)** - Reaffirmed that Israel's establishment of settlements in Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, has no legal validity.
**General Assembly Resolutions:**
- Numerous General Assembly resolutions affirm the right of Palestinians to self-determination, condemn Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people, and call for the return of refugees as per Resolution 194 (III) from 1948 which allows for the return of Palestinian refugees.
**Other Resolutions:**
- There have been resolutions concerning the protection of civilians, cessation of hostilities in Gaza, and humanitarian access, which Israel has been accused of not fully adhering to, especially in conflicts post-2000.
Please note:
- This list is not exhaustive but highlights some of the most frequently cited resolutions.
- Compliance with UN resolutions can be a matter of interpretation. For instance, some resolutions have partial compliance or compliance in some aspects but not others.
- While these resolutions have been criticized for non-compliance, the extent to which Israel has ignored them varies, and in some cases, there might be ongoing or partial implementation or political contestation over the interpretation of these resolutions.
Yes, your point about Germany citing security concerns as a justification for its actions leading up to and during the Holocaust is historically accurate. Here's how that rationale was employed:
1. **Post-World War I Germany**:
- **Stab-in-the-Back Myth**: After Germany's defeat in World War I, many Germans, including Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, propagated the myth that Germany had lost not due to military defeat but because of a betrayal by Jews and leftists from within, often referred to as the "stab in the back." This narrative was used to scapegoat Jews for Germany's economic and social woes.
2. **Rise of the Nazi Party**:
- **Security Against Bolshevism**: The Nazis frequently portrayed Jews, communists, and other groups as threats to national security. This was particularly potent during the rise of the Soviet Union and fears of Bolshevism, where Jews were often conflated with communist ideology in Nazi propaganda.
- **The Enabling Act**: After coming to power, the Nazis used the Reichstag Fire in 1933, allegedly set by a communist, to pass the Enabling Act, which allowed Hitler to rule by decree, citing the need to protect the German state from subversion.
3. **The Holocaust Justification**:
- **Lebensraum and Racial Purity**: The Nazis framed their actions as necessary for creating living space ("Lebensraum") for the German people, which required the removal or extermination of "undesirable" populations, including Jews, for the security and purity of the Aryan race.
- **Militarization and Expansion**: The expansionist policies of Germany, including the annexation of Austria and parts of Czechoslovakia, were justified under the guise of protecting ethnic Germans and securing Germany's future against perceived threats.
4. **The "Final Solution" and Security**:
- **War Time Justifications**: During World War II, the Nazis claimed that the genocide of Jews was part of a broader effort to secure Europe against what they described as Jewish-Bolshevik conspiracies. The Wannsee Conference in 1942, where the systematic killing of Jews was formalized, was justified in part as a wartime security measure.
5. **Propaganda and Public Perception**:
- **Dehumanization and Fear**: Nazi propaganda played a significant role in creating a public perception that Jews were a security threat due to their supposed control over finance, media, and politics, thereby justifying their removal or elimination for the safety of the German nation.
The use of security concerns by the Nazis was a manipulation of public fear and prejudice, serving as a cover for their ideological goals of racial purity and expansion. This historical example shows how the pretext of national security can be used to justify extreme measures, including genocide. It's a stark reminder of how such justifications can be misused to perpetrate or mask atrocities, a lesson relevant to discussions about any contemporary conflict where security is cited as a reason for actions that impact civilian populations.
The comparison between the current rise of anti-Arabism and anti-Islamism with the rise of antisemitism before World War II involves several layers of historical, social, and political analysis:
1. **Historical Context**:
- **Antisemitism Before WWII**: This was deeply rooted in centuries of Christian anti-Judaism, which evolved into racial antisemitism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The culmination of this hatred was the Holocaust, orchestrated by the Nazi regime, which not only targeted Jews but also other groups deemed undesirable.
- **Anti-Arabism/Anti-Islamism Today**: This phenomenon has different roots but shares some similarities with historical antisemitism:
- **Post-9/11 Era**: The attacks on September 11, 2001, significantly heightened Islamophobia in Western countries, painting Arabs and Muslims as threats to national security.
- **Migration and Security Concerns**: The influx of refugees from conflict zones in the Middle East and Africa has fueled xenophobia in some parts of Europe and North America, often conflating issues of immigration with terrorism.
- **Political Rhetoric**: Some political leaders and media outlets have used anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric, sometimes echoing the scapegoating seen with Jews before WWII.
2. **Mechanisms of Prejudice**:
- Both antisemitism then and Islamophobia now often involve:
- **Scapegoating**: Blaming Jews or Muslims for societal or economic problems, much like Jews were blamed for economic downturns or political instability in the past.
- **Conspiracy Theories**: Similar to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion for Jews, there are conspiracy theories targeting Muslims, like claims of "Eurabia" or global Muslim takeovers.
- **Dehumanization**: Stereotyping entire groups as inherently violent, untrustworthy, or culturally incompatible, a tactic used historically against Jews and currently against Muslims.
3. **Societal Impact**:
- **Antisemitism Led to Genocide**: The unchecked spread of antisemitic ideologies directly contributed to the Holocaust.
- **Current Consequences**: While not leading to genocide, the rise in anti-Arabism and Islamophobia has resulted in:
- **Hate Crimes**: An increase in hate crimes against Muslims and those perceived to be Muslim.
- **Policy Discrimination**: Discriminatory policies or practices, sometimes under the guise of security measures.
- **Social
It didn't start on Oct 7. Don't believe the lies. Palestinians have been abducted, dispossessed, tortured, murdered,... for decades. https://x.com/FranceskAlbs/status/1856865954472264117
North Gaza Under Fire: 40 Days of Suffering and Destruction
After forty days of continuous aggression on the northern Gaza Strip, more than 2,000 martyrs, including children and women, have been killed, about 6,000 people have been injured, while about 1,000 civilians and activists have been arrested. The area, which was once teeming with life, has been reduced to ruins, with a severe shortage of basic services such as water and electricity. Families are living in horrific conditions, with homes and infrastructure destroyed, while the international community faces great challenges in providing humanitarian assistance in this ongoing tragedy.
404 days and the massacres continue
404 days and the siege continues
404 days and northern Gaza is being annihilated
404 days and northern Gaza is dying of hunger and thirst
404 days and northern Gaza is being ethnically cleansed
404 days and #Coverage_Continues https://x.com/MohamedAlm22305/status/1856762974532141134
Plase read @DrJillStein https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1856579592280059944
FYI @FranceskAlbs https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856578416675279180
Several types of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) could potentially sue the U.S. administration if they believe there's a case to be made for violation of laws like Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act:
### Human Rights NGOs:
- **Amnesty International USA**: Known for advocating against human rights abuses globally, they might have the inclination and resources to engage in legal action if they believe U.S. policy violates international human rights norms or domestic laws.
- **Human Rights Watch**: They focus on documenting and advocating against human rights abuses, and could potentially be involved in legal cases concerning policy violations.
- **The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR)**: This organization has a history of engaging in litigation against the U.S. government on issues of constitutional rights, international law, and human rights abuses.
### Humanitarian Aid NGOs:
- **Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)**: If U.S. policies directly impact their ability to provide aid, MSF could consider legal action, though they generally focus on operational responses.
- **International Rescue Committee (IRC)**: An organization that might sue if its operational capacity is being hindered by U.S. policy, particularly in conflict zones.
### Peace and Security NGOs:
- **Win Without War**: This coalition of organizations might engage in legal action to challenge U.S. military aid policies they see as contributing to human rights violations or conflicts.
- **Global Justice Now**: Focuses on challenging global injustices, including issues related to armaments and conflict.
### Environmental NGOs:
- While not directly related to Section 620I, if arms sales or aid policies lead to environmental degradation or impact climate refugees, organizations like:
- **Greenpeace USA**
- **The Sierra Club** might have an interest, particularly if there's an environmental angle to the humanitarian crisis.
### NGOs with Legal Capabilities:
- **ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)**: Although primarily focused on civil liberties within the U.S., they sometimes engage with international law issues.
- **EarthRights International**: Combines environmental justice with human rights, which could intersect with arms sales and humanitarian aid.
### Steps for NGOs to Take Legal Action:
1. **Establish Standing:** The NGO must show it has been directly affected by the policy or action in question, which can be challenging but is possible if they operate in affected regions.
2. **Legal Strategy:** They would need to:
- Draft a complaint detailing the legal violation.
- Identify the appropriate court (likely federal due to the parties involved).
- Seek legal representation with experience in federal litigation, constitutional law, and international law.
3. **Funding and Resources:** Litigation against the government can be expensive and lengthy. NGOs would need to secure funding or pro bono legal support.
4. **Alliances:** Often, multiple NGOs band together to share resources, expertise, and increase the impact of their legal challenge.
5. **International or Domestic Focus:** Decide if this is better pursued in U.S. domestic courts or if there's a relevant international legal venue (like arguing before international bodies if applicable).
6. **Public Advocacy:** While suing, these organizations might also engage in public advocacy to raise awareness and put political pressure on the administration.
Remember, any legal action would need to overcome hurdles like standing, the political question doctrine, and executive privilege. NGOs typically engage in such litigation when they have strong evidence of legal violation and believe the courts can provide a remedy or that the lawsuit can prompt policy change through public or political pressure.
Craig Mokhiber, having resigned from his U.N. position and being a human rights lawyer, could indeed act as a lawyer in a case challenging the Biden administration's actions under Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act, provided:
1. **Licensure:** Mokhiber would need to be licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction where the case would be filed, typically in a U.S. federal court. If he is not currently licensed in the relevant jurisdiction, he would need to either:
- Obtain a license through admission to the bar of that jurisdiction or,
- Gain admission pro hac vice (for this specific case), which allows attorneys from other jurisdictions to practice in a specific case with local counsel.
2. **Expertise:** His background in international human rights law could be very relevant, especially if the case involves interpreting Section 620I in light of international law principles, humanitarian aid, and the legal implications of U.S. foreign assistance policies.
3. **Ethical Considerations:**
- **Conflict of Interest:** If Mokhiber has any previous or ongoing relationships with parties involved that might create a conflict of interest, he would need to address this, possibly by withdrawing from any conflicting roles or obtaining waivers from affected parties.
- **Public Statements:** His public statements, especially his resignation letter criticizing U.N. and international policy, might be scrutinized for bias, though in this context, they could also be seen as evidence of his commitment to the issues at hand.
4. **Role in Litigation:**
- **Representation:** He could represent the plaintiffs directly or be part of a legal team.
- **Expert Witness:** Alternatively, given his extensive experience and previous role at the U.N., he could serve as an expert witness providing testimony on human rights, international law, or the interpretation of Section 620I.
5. **Resources:** Litigation of this nature often requires significant resources, including time, legal research, and possibly funding for expert witnesses or travel for discovery. Mokhiber would need to ensure he has the support necessary to handle such a case.
6. **Strategic Considerations:**
- **Legal Strategy:** He would need to strategize around overcoming potential barriers like the political question doctrine, establishing standing, and navigating the complexities of international law intersecting with U.S. domestic law.
- **Publicity and Advocacy:** His involvement could also bring public attention to the issue, potentially aiding in advocacy efforts outside of the courtroom.
Mokhiber's profile as an experienced human rights lawyer with a focus on international issues makes him potentially well-suited for such a role, but the specifics of his participation would depend on his current legal status, ethical considerations, and the strategic needs of the case.
If there's a belief that the Biden administration is violating Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act, which prohibits providing security assistance or arms sales to any country when it is known that the government restricts U.S. humanitarian assistance, there are several potential avenues for legal action:
### Who Can Sue:
1. **Congressional Members:**
- Individual Congress members or groups could potentially sue for an injunction or declaratory judgment that the administration's actions violate the law. However, this is less common because Congress has other tools like oversight, budget control, or legislative action.
2. **Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs):**
- NGOs focused on human rights, international law, or humanitarian efforts might have standing if they can demonstrate harm to their interests or their ability to provide aid.
3. **Affected Individuals or Groups:**
- If there are direct victims or groups affected by the restriction of humanitarian aid, they might have standing, although proving direct harm from U.S. policy decisions could be challenging.
4. **Taxpayers:**
- Under certain circumstances, taxpayers might have standing if they can show they are suffering a particularized injury due to the unconstitutional expenditure of funds, but this is narrow and often difficult to establish in foreign policy matters.
### How to Take the Administration to Court:
1. **Legal Basis:**
- **Standing:** The plaintiff must establish legal standing by showing:
- An injury in fact
- A causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of
- That the injury is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision
- **Merits:** The lawsuit would argue that the administration's actions contradict Section 620I, potentially seeking:
- Declaratory judgment that the actions violate the law
- An injunction to stop the provision of certain types of aid or arms sales
2. **Filing the Lawsuit:**
- **Jurisdiction:** The case would likely be filed in a U.S. District Court, potentially in Washington, D.C., due to the nature of the defendants being federal officials or agencies like the Department of State or Defense.
- **Defendants:** The lawsuit would name relevant government officials, potentially the President, Secretary of State, or Defense Secretary, in their official capacity.
3. **Legal Process:**
- **Complaint:** Draft and file a complaint detailing the violation, the law in question, and the remedy sought.
- **Service:** Serve the complaint to the government defendants.
- **Response:** The government will respond, potentially moving to dismiss for lack of standing or other legal reasons.
- **Discovery:** If the case proceeds, there might be a discovery phase where both sides exchange information.
- **Trial or Summary Judgment:** Eventually, the case might proceed to trial or be decided on motions for summary judgment if there are no material facts in dispute.
4. **Challenges:**
- **Political Question Doctrine:** Courts might view such issues as political questions not suitable for judicial resolution, particularly in foreign policy.
- **Executive Privilege:** Access to information might be limited by claims of executive privilege.
5. **Public Interest Litigation:**
- Often, such cases are pursued by public interest lawyers or organizations specialized in human rights or government accountability, possibly in collaboration with legal scholars who focus on international and constitutional law.
Given the complexity and the political nature of these issues:
- **Legal Counsel:** Engaging with attorneys experienced in constitutional law, international law, and federal litigation would be crucial.
- **Understanding the Limits:** Even if a lawsuit is filed, there's no guarantee of success due to legal doctrines like standing, political question, or the breadth of executive discretion in foreign affairs.
The process would be intricate, requiring careful legal strategy, significant resources, and an understanding of both domestic and international law contexts.
Germany should have to pay for the reconstruction of Palestine when Israel's genocide is finally stopped. https://x.com/LemkinInstitute/status/1856454935145259075
Impeach Biden, Harris and Blinken! Now!
No assistance shall be furnished under this chapter or the Arms Export Control Act to any country when it is made known to the President that the government of such country prohibits or otherwise restricts, directly or indirectly, the transport or delivery of United States humanitarian assistance.
**Section 620I of the Foreign Assistance Act** is a U.S. law that addresses restrictions on the transport or delivery of humanitarian assistance. Here are some key points about this section:
- **Full Text**: "No assistance shall be furnished under this chapter or the Arms Export Control Act to any country when it is made known to the President that the government of such country prohibits or otherwise restricts, directly or indirectly, the transport or delivery of United States humanitarian assistance."
- **Objective**: This section was created to ensure that U.S. humanitarian aid can reach its intended beneficiaries without interference from the recipient country's government. It aims to prevent countries from blocking or restricting aid provided by the United States.
- **Historical Context**: This provision was notably introduced in response to Turkey's blockade of Armenia in the 1990s, which was seen as obstructing U.S. humanitarian aid. The law reflects Congressional intent to use aid as a tool to encourage respect for humanitarian principles.
- **Implementation**: Although this law exists, its implementation has been selective. There have been calls for its application in various contexts, like the humanitarian situation in Gaza, where there were allegations of restrictions on aid by Israel, although enforcement has not been systematic.
- **Exceptions**: There is room for presidential discretion where the President can waive these restrictions if it's deemed to be in the national security interest of the United States. However, this waiver must be justified and reported to Congress.
- **Relevance**: Recently, there have been discussions and advocacy efforts by various groups and legislators to enforce this section more rigorously, especially in situations where countries might be seen as obstructing humanitarian aid.
This law underscores the U.S. commitment to ensuring that its humanitarian assistance reaches people in need, using aid as leverage to promote humanitarian access. However, its application is subject to political considerations, and its enforcement can reflect broader U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Dr. Fareseen Shaheen reviews Palestinian political and diplomatic efforts to support the issue of prisoners and detainees in occupation prisons
Minister Dr. Shaheen explained that Palestinian efforts are focused on activating international support to pressure the occupation to release prisoners and detainees, and improve their detention conditions in line with international law and human rights conventions.
She pointed out that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates is intensifying its communication with international institutions, including the United Nations, to ensure that the voice of prisoners is heard, violations against them are documented, and their release is ensured.
Dear @IntlCrimCourt ,
I have reason to believe that a terrorist organization known as I..... has put renowned journalist Hossam Shabat and his family on a death list.
We have seen this pattern several times before.
Are you going to do anything about it? https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1856278594651083171
Dear @RSF_en,
I have reason to believe that a terrorist organization known as I..... has put renowned journalist Hossam Shabat and his family on a death list.
We have seen this pattern several times before.
Are you going to do anything about it? https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1856278594651083171
Dear @pressfreedom,
I have reason to believe that a terrorist organization called I..... has put renowned journalist Hossam Shabat and his family on a death list.
We have seen this pattern several times before.
Are you going to do anything about it? https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1856278594651083171
We've seen that before. More than once. First the occupation kills their families, then they kill the journalist. @AJEnglish https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856279040342069425
Shabat family is being destroyed
Two massacres in less than a week https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1856278594651083171
We've seen that many times before. First the occupation kills their families, then they kill the Journalist. https://x.com/R34lB0rg/status/1856277585723863314
A new massacre against the Shabat family, in which 15 martyrs were killed in the city of Beit Hanoun
Martyr Dr. Muhammad Jamal Shabat, his wife, his sons, his three sisters, and his nephews
His wife and cousin Munir Shabat's children https://x.com/HossamShabat/status/1856275509832781833